Who's
Manipulating Whom in the News?
"Will and Grace" Financial Manipulation Lawsuit Settled
(posted 4-29-07) The creators of the "Will and Grace" television show settled a multi-million
dollar lawsuit on Friday that they had filed against NBC Studios. The amount of the settlement was not disclosed. NBC Studios had agreed to provide creators David Kohan and Jason "Max" Mutchnick a profit- sharing
agreement as a major portion of their pay for work they did on the series. The lawsuit says that NBC violated its agreement
in the following ways (partial list): 1. The contract stated that NBC would pay each
of the show's creators at least as much as it would pay anyone else involved with the show. This
turned out not to be the case. 2. Initial production costs were put on the books at $68 million,
which was an inflated figure. 3. NBC Studios' sale of rights for the show to its
sister company, the NBC Network, was below fair market value for Seasons 5, 6, & 7. 4. Ratings
bonuses for the show's main director were improperly deducted from profit-sharing payments due to Kohan and Mutchnick.
The jury determined that Kohan and Mutchnick were due $48.5 million, but a settlement was reached before the award
could be announced. Yahoo News (4-27-07) HollywoodReporterEsq.com article by Leslie Simmons (2-7-07)

|
| Photo of David Kohan & Max Mutchnick from imdb.com |
Former CIA Director Implies Bush Wanted to Attack Iraq
(posted on 4-27-07) Former CIA director George Tenet has charged in a new book that the Bush administration
took the nation to war without ever conducting a serious discussion of whether Iraq was an imminent threat. In addition, he
stated that, to his knowledge, no alternative views of containing Saddam Hussein besides "regime change" were discussed. Dick Cheney has said in the past that Tenet's use of the term "slam dunk" to describe whether a case
could be made that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction was a significant factor in the president's
decision to invade. While acknowledging that he used the term, Tenet said that he used it in expressing his opinion that
a White House presentation he saw about the need to invade Iraq could be made more convincingly. New York Times article by Scott Shane and Mark Mazzetti (4-26-07)

|
| Photo of George Tenet from meib.org |
Jessica Lynch Says Army Lied in Portraying Her as "Rambo"
(posted on 4-25-07) Jessica Lynch was a 19-year-old private who was taken prisoner during an ambush
in the early days of the US invasion of Iraq. The Army described her as a one-woman killing machine who was captured while
firing at the enemy. Instead, she said, in a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing, she was simply riding
in a truck at the time. She said, "I am still confused as to why they chose to lie and tried
to make me a legend when the real heroics of my fellow soldiers that day were, in fact, legendary." guardian.co.uk article by Ewen MacAskill (4-25-07)
Lynch is apparently unaware that the military is in the advertising and promotion business, selling
the war to the American public so that it can attract more funding and recruits.

|
| Photo of Jessica Lynch from salon.com |
Head of US General Services Administration Uses Government Resources
to Back Republican Agenda (posted on 4-23-07) Senators Byron Dorgan (D-ND) and Ron Wyden
(D-OR) today publicly called for the resignation of Government Services Administration (GSA) head Lurita Doan. The GSA is
in charge of federal government purchasing. Doan is a political appointee who has allegedly used her office to remove
several career negotiators from their positions for not giving a contract to Sun Microsystems, a large Republican donor. She
then gave Sun the contract, reportedly at an additional cost of $5 million to the taxpayers. Doan also
dramatically cut the budget for the Office of the GSA Inspector General, which investigates waste, fraud, and abuse. Twenty-five Democratic senators today signed a letter to White House chief-of-staff Josh Bolten, asking for an explanation
for a meeting Doan apparently organized that had a high ranking White House political insider make a presentation to her staff
on Republican goals for the 2008 election. At the meeting, she reportedly asked her team what they might do to help get "our
candidates elected." Presumably, she was suggesting they give purchasing contracts to Republican donors that weren't
the low bidder. wyden.senate.gov (4-23-07) tpmmuckraker.com article by Paul Kiel (4-23-07)

|
| Photo of Lurita Doan from gsa.gov |
Alec Baldwin Angrily Disparages Daughter in Voice-Mail Diatribe
(posted on 4-21-07) Actor Alec Baldwin, irritated that his daughter, Ireland, did not answer the telephone
when he called at an apparently pre-arranged time, unleashed his rage on her in a several minute long voice-mail in which
he called her a "rude, thoughtless little pig." He also asserted that "You don't
have the brains or the decency as a human being--- I don't give a damn that you are 12 or 11 or a child or that your mother
is a thoughtless pain in the ass who doesn't care what you do." In an apology released
yesterday, Baldwin said "I'm sorry for losing my temper with my child. I have been driven to the edge by parental
alienation for many years now. You have to go through this to understand."
Baldwin
and Basinger are engaged in a bitter custody dispute five years after their divorce. Baldwin claims that Basinger has blocked
his visitation rights and also his right to speak with his daughter on a number of occasions. metimes.com (4-21-07) Yahoo News (4-21-07) MonstersandCritics.com (10-5-06)

|
| Photo of Alec Baldwin from MonstersandCritics.com |
Attorney General Provides Lessons on How Not to Fire Employees
(posted on 4-20-07) Yesterday US Senators on the Judiciary Committee grilled Attorney General Alberto
Gonzales on why he fired 8 of the 93 US Attorneys. Here is what we learned:
1. Gonzales asked
his chief-of-staff, Kyle Sampson, to provide him with a list of names of people to be replaced. 2.
Gonzales did not lay out a process to be used and Sampson did not manage the project in a formal, organized
way. He kept few notes. 3 Over a two year period, senior staff at the Department of
Justice provided Sampson with complaints they received, which were primarily from Republicans who didn't
approve of who the attorneys were prosecuting. 4. Sampson heard about people's complaints but
didn't hear the attorneys' side of the story. 5. When Sampson provided Gonzales with the list
of names to be fired, Gonzales did not ask or learn why the attorneys were put there. He said he was "not
surprised" that most of the names passed onto him were there and so he moved forward without additional input. 6. Gonzales didn't tell the attorneys that he had concerns about their performance, which would
have given them a chance to change how they were doing their jobs to please him. 7. Gonzales did not
call any of them personally to tell them they were fired. When they were called, none of the attorneys were given reasons.
The majority of them had been given excellent performance evaluations. 8. At least five of the seven fired
on 12/7/06 had investigations going on that the administration was not happy about or had not prosecuted Democrats who the
administration wanted prosecuted. 9. The attorney who was fired prior to 12/7/06 was let go in order to be
replaced by a protege of Karl Rove.
Is there irony that the Department of Justice runs based on evidence
but that standard was not applied to firing their own employees? c-span.org (4-19-07)

|
| Photo of Alberto Gonzales from VoltaireNet.org |
Bush Nominates Corporate Lobbyist to Head Consumer Product Safety
Commission (posted on 4-19-07) President Bush has nominated Michael Baroody, who has spent the last 13 years lobbying to eliminate product safety laws, to head the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
As executive vice president of the National Association of Manufacturers, Baroody has overseen its efforts to
limit medical malpractice awards, make it more difficult for to use class action lawsuits, prevent government agencies from
suing companies that engage in illegal activities, and limit companies' liability from unsafe products and practices.
The attempt to hire a person with a background like this to head a federal
regulatory agency engaged in helping consumers remain safe likely means that the president (a) wants to hamstring the commission,
or (b) he wants to reward a loyal Republican. citizen.org (4-07)
Irony for Sale: AT&T and Microsoft Urge Justice Department
to Nix Google Acquisition (posted on 4-17-07) AT&T, whose monopoly was broken up by
the federal government in 1984, and Microsoft, which has been investigated and sued by both the US government and the European
Commission for anti-competitive practices, are asking the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission to stop Google's
purchase of DoubleClick ad agency. DoubleClick is the nation's leading supplier of digital
advertising services and Google has the largest network of advertising partners on whose space ads can be placed. Together,
they would have large economies of scale and a unique ability to both create and place ads quickly and easily on the
Internet. This would allow Google to create ads that better take advantage of what it has learned about people who click on
its sites. LA Times editorial (4-17-07) Forbes.com (4-16-07)
LAPD Asks for and Receives $50,000 from Philip Morris for Counterfeit
Cigarette Investigation (posted on 4-16-07) Chief Bill Bratton of the Los Angeles Police
Department (LAPD) recently solicited and received $50,000 from Philip Morris USA to help pay for an investigation into the
distribution and sale of some of its brands' counterfeit cigarettes.
There
is concern that if corporations provide funding for the police, the city will come to rely on those funds more, and
less taxpayer funds become available. The LAPD has a severe shortage of officers and this
opens the door to people and corporations receiving police services like Congress receives lobbyists, where the police provide
the best service to those who pay them the most money. LA Times article by Patrick McGreevy (4-15-07)

|
| Photo of Bill Bratton from MilkenInstitute.org |
US Attorney in New Mexico Appears to Have Been Fired for Political
Reasons (posted on 4-15-07) New Mexico Senator Pete Domenici was the driving force behind
the firing of US Attorney David Iglesias, according to the Albuquerque Journal. Domenici wanted Iglesias to indict a Democrat
in a tight New Mexico congressional race prior to the 2006 election, but Iglesias did not think it was proper. Domenici tried to get Iglesias moved into a different position in the Justice Department, but he wouldn't
take it. Then the Senator asked Alberto Gonzales to fire Iglesias but Gonzales refused. So
Domenici went to Karl Rove about the issue and later spoke to President Bush in a telephone meeting. abqjournal.com article by Mike Gallagher (4-15-07)
Senator Domenici had no business seeking the removal of David Iglesias. Once a US attorney is
placed in office, he cannot be removed just because a politician doesn't like who he does and does not choose to prosecute.
However, Domenici appears to think differently behind the scenes than he does in public.

|
| Photo of David Iglesias from ncjrs.gov |
Wolfowitz Manipulates World Bank Rules for His Girlfriend's
Benefit (posted on 4-13-07) President Bush appointed Paul Wolfowitz, one of the
key architects of the Iraq War, to be president of the World Back, in spite of his lack of qualifications. Now, Wolfowitz
has used his position to secure a higher level job for his girlfriend at the State Department at a higher salary than Condoleeza
Rice gets. Shaha Riza had previously worked at the World Bank, but both she and Wolfowitz were violating its rules forbid
couples from working together. This is not the first controversial personnel decision Wolfowitz
has made at the World Bank. He violated bank policy by promoting another Bush administration political appointee, Kevin Kellems,
to a directorship position and making him a Senor Advisor. Directors at the World Bank report to vice-presidents and never
are supposed to serve as Senior Advisors to the president of the Bank. Kellems previously served as Dick Cheney's communications
director and spokesman. Wolfowitz also hired Robin Cleveland, an authoritarian figure who regularly
offends people she talks to. Cleveland was a long-time aide to Senator Mitch McConnell, one of George W. Bush's biggest
supporters on the War in Iraq. guardian.co.uk article by Richard Adams (4-13-07) TheWashingtonNote.com article by Steve Clemons (4-12-07) TheWashingtonNote.com article by Steve Clemons (1-20-06)

|
| Photo of Paul Wolfowitz from fiscalstudy.com |
Imus Finally Gets What He Has Deserved for So Long
(posted on 4-12-07) When Don Imus described the Rutgers women's basketball team as "nappy-headed
hos," he thought he was making just one more disparaging characterization of people in the spotlight. Criticism and judgment are such a large part of his persona that he didn't get that this time he was going too
far in making fun of a group of vulnerable young African American women who had over-achieved in ascending to the national
stage through hard work. His depiction over the public airwaves of the women as tough, unattractive blacks who were making earning
money in the world's oldest profession belied not only their basketball skills, but also their academic and musical
talents, which were described at a press conference on Tuesday. Imus is an example of a man who
has made a career of put-downs and criticism and is finally paying for his sins. People will take negativity
and judgment for only so long before they finally start fighting back. And now they're taking him down.

|
| Photo of Don Imus from voccoquan.com |
Badly Planned Iraq War Stretches Military (posted
on 4-11-07) Four more National Guard brigades (1500-to-3500 troops) have been called up and five regular
army brigades may have their one year duty increased by as much as four months. The National Guard brigades won't be sent
until December. As of now, the troop surge ordered by President Bush in January will last through
August. The Army has already sent two brigades back into combat without their normal one year respite. When
a state's National Guard is sent to Iraq, their vehicles and equipment normally go with them. Florida has about 650 National
Guard members in Iraq, along with 500 Humvees, 600 trucks, and needed supplies. If a major hurricane hits the State,
there may be less than an adequate number of troops and equipment to save lives. latimes.com article by Peter Spiegel and Richard Simon (4-10-07) latimes.com article by the Associated Press (4-10-07)
Brave Choices Top Democratic Candidates Choose Not to Debate on Fox "News" (posted on 4-10-07)
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have joined John Edwards in making the decision to not participate in
any Democratic party debates on Fox "News." In spite of inevitable charges of appearing weak, the trio have concluded
that: --- Fox is significantly more interested in using what the candidates say as material
for attacking them than in presenting their viewpoints. --- If they participate in Democratic
party debates on Fox, they legitimize the notion that Fox is "fair and balanced." --- Their participation attracts
more viewers to Fox. Huffington Post article by Jim Kuhnhenn of the Associated Press (4-9-07)
|
The Three Largest So. Cal. Supermarket Chains Agree to Band Together in Case
of Strike (posted on 4-6-07) Albertson's, owned by Supervalue, Ralphs, owned
by Kroger, and Vons, owned by Safeway, have all agreed to band together if the grocery clerks' union strikes
against any one chain in Southern California. Their agreement means that in case of a strike, all three chains will
lockout their workers. In addition, the chains will aid each other financially if one is hurt, though details were not
disclosed. The lockout by all three chains would significantly affect shoppers who do not want buy from stores whose
employees are picketing.
In 2003-2004, the chains took a hard line in negotiations due to the expected entrance
of Wal-Mart into the "marketplace." However, the threat never materialized. This time, no reason has
been publicly given. dailynews.com article by Julia M. Scott (4-4-07) latimes.com article by Alana Semuels (4-5-07)
Bush Appoints $50,000 Donor As Ambassador to Belgium While Senate
is on Recess (posted on 4-5-07) Sam Fox, 77, whose main qualification appears
to have been making a $50,000 donation to "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth," was appointed yesterday while the Senate
was on recess as Ambassador to Belgium by President Bush. Bush had previously nominated Fox for the position but withdrew
his nomination a week ago after strong opposition from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
In 2004, Swift Boat
Veterans for Truth worked to discredit John Kerry's military service during the Vietnam War. It's success in doing
so contributed significantly to Bush's victory over Kerry. Since the election, the Swift Boaters' claims have been
largely discredited.
Fox has donated over $1 million to Republican candidates and causes since 1990. stltoday.com article by Philip Dine (4-5-07) cnn.com (4-4-05)

|
| Photo of Sam Fox from stltoday.com |
Bush Is A Little Too Anxious to Fund the War
(4-5-07) At his press conference on Tuesday, President Bush emphasized that it had now been 57 days since
he sent Congress his request for more funds for the War in Iraq. He added, "It's irresponsible for the Democratic
leadership in Congress to delay for months on end while our troops in combat are waiting for the funds.
However,
he failed to mention that during the last Congressional session led by Republicans, his request for $82 billion for took 86
days to fund and and his request for $72 billion took 119 days to fund.
After the 119 day delay, he said "I
applaud those Members of Congress who came together in a fiscally responsible way to provide much-needed funds for the War
on Terror and continued Hurricane Katrina recovery, as well as for securing our border and protecting against a possible avian
flu pandemic. Responding to these critical needs in a timely way is not easy, but it must be done if we are to fight terrorism,
defend our homeland, enforce our borders, and fulfill our moral obligation to help our fellow Americans in need." thinkprogress.org (4-3-07) whitehouse.gov (6-15-06)
McCain Lies to Public About How Safe Baghdad Is (posted on
4-4-07) Senator John McCain regularly goes on television and radio talk shows to tell people that Iraq
is safer than most of us realize. He mocked newsman Wolf Blitzer on CNN last week by telling him that Blitzer's
attitude about Baghdad being dangerous was old news: "General Petraeus goes out there almost every day in an unarmed
Humvee. I think you ought to catch up. You are giving the old line of three months ago."
In a
recent radio interview, McCain said that "there are neighborhoods in Baghdad where you and I could walk through those
neighborhoods, today."
However, this past week, when he walked through the streets of Baghdad with
General Petraeus, he was surrounded by about one hundred armed US soldiers and covered by three helicopters. When a reporter spoke
to General Petraeus' spokesman, he learned that the General "never goes out in anything less than an up-armored
Humvee." Retired General Barry McCaffrey just returned from Iraq and said in a report that no Iraqi government
official, coalition soldier, diplomat, reporter, foreign NGO, nor contractor can walk the streets of Baghdad, nor Mosul, nor
Kirkuk, nor Basra, nor Tikrit, nor Najaf, nor Ramadi -- without heavily armed protection."
After his walk
through Baghdad, Senator McCain was asked for his assessment of the situation there. He replied by saying "Things
are getting better in Iraq, and I am pleased with the progress that has been made." "Situation Room" transcript (3-27-07) salon.com article by Tom Grieve (3-28-07) salon.com article by Tom Grieve (4-2-07)

|
| Photo of John McCain from fullcircle.typepad.com |
Pharmaceutical Industry and Federal Government Conspire to
Defraud the Public (posted on 4-2-07) The pharmaceutical industry currently
spends $100 million annually for campaign contributions and lobbying activities to build and protect its profits. The best
example of this is the Medicare prescription drug bill, passed 3 1/2 years ago by a Republican Congress and signed by President
Bush. This law prohibits the federal government from negotiating on behalf of seniors, allowing
companies to charge US citizens more money than people in any other country. It also allows drug companies to continue to
raise prices over time. The Veterans Administration, because it negotiates on behalf of veterans, is able to secure significantly
lower prices than seniors for the same drugs. Prior to their vote, Congress was told that
the projected cost of the bill was $395 billion over 10 years. However, the Medicare Chief Actuary, Richard Foster, later
told Congress that he revised this number to $534 million before the vote; but the head of the Medicare program for the government,
Tom Scully, told him to withhold the new estimate if he wanted to keep his job. At the same time, Scully was negotiating a
job for himself at a Washington law firm as a high-powered lobbyist. He took the job about ten days after President Bush signed
the bill into law. A minimum of 15 congressmen, staffers, and federal officials who worked on the Medicare bill have since
left to go to work for the pharmaceutical industry. Since the new Democratic Congress took over
in January, the House has passed a bill to require that the federal government negotiate on behalf of seniors. However, the
drug industry is spending millions of dollars in the Senate to try to defeat it, and even if it passes, President Bush says
he will veto it. "60 Minutes" transcript (4-1-07)
Enough Is Enough! Matthew Dowd, Top Bush Adviser, Publicly Breaks With President (posted on 4-1-07) Matthew
Dowd, one President Bush's top campaign strategists in 2004, has publicly announced that he has split with the president.
In particular, Mr. Dowd stated the following: --- The president shows continued intransigence
on the War in Iraq. --- Bush has not called for a shared sacrifice. ---
He didn't hold high ranking people accountable for the problems at Abu Ghraib. --- He governs
with a "my way or the highway" approach. --- His circle of advisers is too small. --- His handling of Hurricane Katrina was poor. --- His happily entertained
Lance Armstrong around the same time he refused to meet with Cindy Sheehan. --- His re-nomination
of John Bolton as UN ambassador after the Democrats had not confirmed him showed an unwillingness to work with them. NY Times article by Jim Ruttenberg (4-1-07)

|
| Photo of Matthew Dowd from SimonSays.com |
|
 |
 |

Privatization Is Growing Exponentially (posted on 4-30-07) Federal, state and local governments are now busy selling off their infrastructure to meet immediate
budget shortfalls at the expense of increased fees that users will pay for many years to come. Airports, shipping ports, utilities,
bridges, and roads are amongst the items being privatized for immediate cash. The new owners,
many of them foreign investors with dollars built up from years of trade surpluses with the US, are becoming monopolists with
the leverage to raise prices to levels they need in order to make a sizable return. Private organizations, which don't
have to answer to taxpayers, are also freer to enact flexible pricing schedules, such as charging higher amounts to drivers
who use toll roads during peak hours. Not only are budget shortfalls motivating privatization,
but so is the need for maintenance. In 2007, federal, state, and local governments need to spend about $155 billion just to
maintain highways and bridges. There is reason for concern about the quality of the upkeep of
infrastructure that is purchased. Quality performance is not easily quantifiable; but even when it is, all contracts
will not be written so that governments and new asset-holders will agree on whether appropriate maintenance is being
provided. In addition, governments won't necessarily have the leverage to be able to enforce quality standards. Since
leases typically run from 25-to-100 years, it will sometimes be difficult for governments to regain control. This is especially
true since much of the infrastructure that is purchased is likely to be re-sold several times over the terms of the leases. Over the past two years, about $7 billion in public infrastructure was privatized; in the next two years, close to
$100 billion is expected to be brought in. Business Week article by Emily Thornton (5-7-07 magazine issue date)
Alternative Minimum Tax Now Impacts 23 Million Taxpayers in Mostly Blue States
(posted on 4-28-07) The Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) was passed in 1969, targeting 155 of the highest
income households in the United States that paid little or no federal income taxes. However, because the AMT is not indexed
to inflation nor is affected by President Bush's recent tax cuts, a rapidly increasing number of taxpayers are now impacted.
In 2005, about 3.4 million taxpayers paid the AMT instead of their regular tax burden; in 2006, 23 million taxpayers paid
it. The burden of the AMT is most often shouldered by people in states with high state income
taxes because these taxes are not deductible under the AMT. These states include California, New York, Connecticut, New Jersey,
Massachusetts, and Maryland, which by no coincidence, all vote Democratic. The AMT also can adversely
affect married couples, people with kids, homeowners, and people with large amounts of medical expenses because exemptions
and deductions for these items do not affect it. Because of the AMT, it is expected that mostly
middle-class taxpayers will pay about one trillion dollars in additional federal income taxes over the next ten years. wikipedia.org tonawanda-news.com (4-25-07) Seattle Pilot article by Mary Deibel from the Scripps Howard News Service (1-17-04)
Some Big Lies from the Administration of George W. Bush (posted on 4-27-07) 1. Saddam Hussein is a threat to the United States. 2. America is fighting for the freedom
of the the Iraqi people. 3. We have to fight them there so we don't have to fight them here. 4.
Iraq is the central front of the War on Terror. 5. Joe Wilson was sent on a junket to Niger by his wife. 6. Eight US Attorneys were asked to resign for performance reasons (seven on one day).
The "Big Lie" (posted on 4-26-07) The
"Big Lie" is a term first used defined by Hitler to describe a lie so monstrous that people believe that no one
would have the gall to tell it if it weren't true. The phrase was also used in a report
by the United States' government in describing the psychology Hitler used to manipulate the population. The report stated that "His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong;
never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate
on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; and people will believe a big lie sooner than a little
one." One of Hitler's best propagandists, Friz Kippler, said that two steps
needed to be taken to get the majority of the population to believe a Big Lie. First, an issue needed to be reduced to a black-or-white
choice that almost everyone could understand. Second, that oversimplification needed to be repeated over and over. Hitler convinced Germans that the Polish people were being abused by a tyrant who would someday threaten Germany. He
then invaded Poland and started World War II. In addition, of course, he convinced Germans that Jews were the cause
of Germany's problems. wikipedia.org thenation.com article by Robert Scheer (11-16-05) CommonDreams.org article by Thom Hartmann (8-26-04)
Republicans Find Ways to Suppress Certain Groups of Voters
(posted on 4-21-07) Our society makes voting difficult or uncomfortable for minorities, convicted
felons, legal immigrants, and other groups that often have low incomes. Most people in these categories
are Democrats.
Republican political operatives sometimes work to lower the
turnout amongst the groups in our society that are most vulnerable to intimidation. These are primarily low-income earners and
others with the most to lose in a potential confrontation with the law. The biggest barriers to registering voters are
proof-of-citizenship requirements. Many low-income people do not have easy access to these documents. Any
rules that require drivers' licenses for identification eliminate about 12% of potential voters. These people primarily
consist of minorities, senior citizens, students, and others with low incomes. Long lines at
the polls also suppress voters. In the 2004 election, many voters spent over an hour in line, while voters in Ohio sometimes
waited four or more hours. These lines were almost all in low-income and minority districts. Voting
rules vary from state to state. No democracy in the world besides the United States takes the right to vote from
citizens that have completed their sentences. While many countries, including Israel, France, Norway, and Denmark, allow
felons in prison to cast votes, 48 states and the District of Colombia prohibit it in the US. Convicted felons in most states
are not allowed to vote, even after they have been released from prison. About 5.3 million Americans, most of them low-income
or minority, are not able to vote in the US due to felony laws. pfaw.org
Does Bush Try to Provoke Terror? (posted 4-19-07) In his
book, Conservatives Without Conscience, John Dean, former counsel to President Nixon, states that "Many people believe that neoconservatives
and many Republicans appreciate that they are more likely to maintain influence and control of the presidency if the nation
remains under ever-increasing threats of terrorism, so they have no hesitation in pursuing policies that can provoke potential
terrorists throughout the world."
Many people also believe that Bush, Cheney, and other neocons gain
in the same way when they boast to the world that "We haven't had a terrorist attack since 9/11." Conservatives Without Conscience, by John W. Dean, Page 82, (2006)
Bush Uses Unprecedented Number of "Signing Statements" to Undermine
Laws (posted on 4-17-07) President Bush used signing statements to disobey more than 750
laws that were enacted in his first five years and three months office, all from a Republican Congress. In contrast,
Bill Clinton did it 140 times in eight years, only two of them with a Democratic Congress. Bush
vetoed no bills during that period of time; instead, he signed them and then issued "signing statements," which
tell the federal bureaucracy how to implement the new law. These signing statements tell the bureaucracy what to follow and
what not to follow. Legal scholars have determined that the scope and power Bush has assumed are
an unprecedented attempt to expand his influence at the expense of Congress. Portland State University law professor Phillip
Cooper said "There is no question that this administration has been involved in a very carefully thought-out, systematic
process of expanding presidential power at the expense of the other branches of government. This is really big, very expansive,
and very significant. Bush has used signing statements on laws that have banned torture, required
background checks on civilian contractors in Iraq, authorized Congress to receive information on FBI national security wiretaps,
and offered protection to whistle-blowers at nuclear regulatory facilities. The president has used these signing statements
to tell federal workers not to enforce these laws after he signed them. Boston Globe article by Charlie Savage (4-30-07)
Bush's War Is Destroying the US Army (posted on 4-13-07) Since President Bush chose to invade Iraq over four years ago, the Army has been steadily disintegrating.
Fewer and fewer people are re-enlisting, which puts added pressure on those who are there to get the job done. The Army
is meeting its recruiting goals, but only by taking recruits that they used to turn down. Now they are taking more people
who don't have high school diplomas, many more people who have committed felonies, and now are accepting recruits
who range in age from 36-to-42. The standard is for troops to be in combat for one year and back
at their base for at least two. Now, some units go back in less than a year. All troops will now be deployed in
combat for up to 16 months. There is less time for training and less time for rejuvenation. In addition,
a shortage of equipment and armor means that when soldiers are deployed to Iraq they are not necessarily familiar with what
they'll be using.
All this means more deaths, more physical injuries, and more psychological trauma.
About 170,000 troops have been deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan more than once. Those soldiers chances of getting acute
combat stress is 50% greater than those who are only deployed for one tour of duty. This war is not only killing our
troops; it's also killing our our Army. Time Magazine article by Mark Thompson (4-5-07)
"Environmentalism, Bush Style" (posted on 4-12-07) As
April 15th approaches, more 2006 hybrid car buyers will be taking their tax credits. Wired magazine calls it "environmentalism,
Bush style."
Rather than offer greater tax credits to those who purchase the most fuel-efficient cars, the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 offers more money to people who buy heavier, less-fuel efficient cars. Buyers of hybrid SUVs
get a bigger write-off, on average, than do buyers of the most fuel-efficient cars that are produced. For example, the
purchase of a Toyota Highlander Hybrid, which gets 33 miles per gallon, earns a $2600 credit, while a Honda Insight, which
gets 57 miles per gallon, earns a $1450 tax credit.
The greatest write-offs are earned because of the fuel
savings that hybrids get in comparison to cars of a similar weight. This provides the incentive for automakers to continue
making large cars, but to make them more fuel-efficient, rather than to simply make cars that get the best mileage. wired.com article by John Gartner (10-11-05)
Some Pharmacies Take Huge Markups on Generic Drugs (posted
on 4-11-07) When prescription drugs lose their patent protection, most competitors that sell the generic
versions of those medicines sell them to pharmacies at a greatly reduced price. However, many large chains with pharmacies
don't pass a significant part of those price decreases along to consumers. Zocor, for example,
designed to lower cholesterol and one of the most prescribed medications in the nation, lost its patent protection last June.
Just one month ago, while a typical month's supply was priced in the $140-to-$160 range at the major chains, cvs.com and
walgreens.com were selling the generic equivalent, Simvastatin for $80 and $90, respectively. Meanwhile, Sam's Club
was selling the exact same product for $7 and CostCo was selling it for $12. CostCo told the "Wall Street Journal"
that in can buy the product for $2.71. Zoloft, an anti-depressant, is another good example. It
also lost its patent protection last summer. While it ranged in price from about $75-to-$95 at the major chains one month
ago, a typical one month supply of Sertraline, its generic equivalent, was selling at Wal-Mart for $56 and walgreens.com for
$74. Sam's Club and CostCo were selling it profitably for about $6. Why the big differences
in price? CVS and Walgreen's claim that their "pricing model" requires them to make profits for their stores
on drugs, while stores like Sam's Club and CostCo can make their profits on lots of other items. The reality is that CVS
and Walgreen's are gouging the consumer because they can get away with it. Unbelievably (pun
intended), spokesmen for CVS and Walgreens told the Wall Street Journal that their profit margins on prescription drugs are
2-to-3 percent. "Wall Street Journal" by Sarah Rubenstein, Page
D1 (3-13-07)
"Who Killed the Electric Car?" (posted on 4-10-07)
In 1996, General Motors introduced its first electric vehicle, called the EV1. GM leased out all of its
EV1s, so no consumers owned them. Lessors loved them! They were maintenance-free, clean, and ran well. In spite of their
success, however, GM stopped renewing their last leases in 2004; and the last ones were shredded soon after
they were returned. Why did GM require people who wanted to re-lease their EV1s to return them
to a dealership and subsequently shred them? Here are some theories: GM would make a lot less
money on parts because a lot less maintenance would be required for EV1s than vehicles with internal combustion engines. Oil companies funded fake consumer groups that raised public questions about whether taxpayers should fun battery
charging stations. These groups also raised questions in the media about whether there were real environmental benefits of
electric vehicles. These questions made GM think that demand was less than it was in reality. Texaco purchased
GM's battery technology patents to prevent competition.
In promoting a car that is clean, GM would be implicitly
acknowledging that the cars that it makes the most amount of money from are dirty.
The California Air Resources
Board mandated that in order to sell cars in the future in California, manufacturers would have to sell an increasing percentage
with zero emissions. GM hated those mandates.
Most of the large funds that own GM stock own a lot more oil
company stock. These funds put pressure on the GM board of directors to stop producing electric cars. "Who Killed the Electric Car?" documentary (2006) evi.org
Former White House Insider Says White House Manipulates Christians
(posted on 4-9-07) David Kuo, former deputy director of the Office of Faith-Based Initiatives at the
White House, recently authored a book entitled "Tempting Faith." In the book, Kuo says that the Bush administration
manipulates Christians to meet its political agenda. According to Robert Altemeyer, a professor
at the University of Manitoba who has researched and written extensively on authoritarians, we should not be surprised about
what Kuo says. Authoritarians generally show disdain for their their followers. They are able to look their supporters
in the eye and lie convincing. Altemeyer says that "authoritarian leaders, when responding to research surveys, admit
that manipulating others, exploiting the gullible, intimidating, cheating, and being a hypocrite are all justified if they
get you what you want." Both Democrats and Republicans lie and cheat, but research shows
that Republican politicians are much more likely to dominate and manipulate their way to power. There are two reasons for
this. First, Republicans believe in a strong president, military power, big business, the virtue of self-interest, and punishment/reward
motivation, all of which flow out of authoritarianism. Second, the majority of followers with authoritarian tendencies are
on the right side of the political spectrum, looking for leaders and role models. Many of these followers have grown up in
religious households where adult authority was used to make decisions that affected family life. "Authoritarian followers,"
as they are called, often operate out of fear and will attack when their authorities tell them to. Authoritarian
followers, based on survey answers, are highly conventional, zealous, self-righteous, and religious. They also have a lot
of fear in them, which leads to aggressiveness. According to Altemeyer, "One of the classic reactions to fear is to fight,
and the followers will attack when their authorities tell them to." Ironically, by following authoritarian leaders, authoritarian
followers end up with an amoral government run by people who keep telling them how wonderful they are (as long as
they keep following their leaders). BarbaraNY9.blogspot.com Tempting Faith: An Inside Story of Political Seduction, by David Kuo (2006)

|
| Photo of David Kuo from msnbcmedia4.msn.com |
Professor/Researcher Finds That Large Majority of Authoritarians are Republicans
(posted of 4-6-07) Robert Altemeyer, who has researched authoritarians for over thirty years, has
found that they are almost always right-wingers. Most often, they are aggressive for the pure pleasure of it.
The are motivated by their beliefs that they are almost always right and that the world is a very dangerous place. They
have a propensity to attack others, both fairly and unfairly.
Altemeyer has divided authoritarians into two groups---
leaders and followers. The leaders are usually men who are dominating, oppose equality, desirous of personal power,
amoral, intimidating, vengeful, pitiless, exploitive, manipulative, dishonest, mean-spirited, create false images to sell
themselves, and are usually politically and economically conservative Republicans.
The followers are both submissive
to authority and aggressive on behalf of it, highly religious, with moderate to little education, trust untrustworthy authorities,
prejudiced, intolerant, zealous, dogmatic, hypocritical, moralistic, severely punitive, demand loyalty and return it, have
little self-awareness, and are usually politically and economically conservative Republicans. Conservatives Without Conscience, by John W. Dean, Pages 66-69 (2006)

|
| Photo of Robert Altemeyer from bendweekly.com |
President Bush Uses Doublespeak to Justify Troop Surge (posted
on 4-5-07) At his press conference on Tuesday, President Bush, showing that he will say almost anything
to justify sending more troops into Iraq, declared that "The solution to Iraq - an Iraq that can govern itself, sustain
itself, and defend itself - is more than a military mission. Precisely the reason why I sent more troops into Baghdad."
thinkprogress.org (4-3-07)
Leaders Instill Fear to Get the Public to Comply With Their Wishes
(posted on 4-4-07) Leaders everywhere use propaganda techniques to avoid telling the truth and to get
the public to back its policies. Perhaps the most effective technique takes advantage of fear. When we are afraid of losing
what we have, we are likely to do what our leaders tell us to do. If we are afraid of being killed
in a terrorist attack and our president tells us that if we knew everything he did we'd "be very afraid," we're
likely to follow his recommendations for protecting ourselves. If, on the other hand, we are more afraid of losing our democracy,
we are likely to do whatever we can to prevent that. Leaders will try to push our emotional buttons
by making us afraid and then tell us what to do to alleviate the fear. PropagandaCritic.com
Republican Presidential Candidates Are Open to Arresting Citizens Without Charging
Them (posted on 4-3-07) When questioned recently about whether it was acceptable to arrest
US citizens without without charging them with committing a crime, Rudy Giuliani said that he would want to use that authority
infrequently. Mitt Romney is evidently open to the possibility, saying that he wasn't sure because he would want to hear
the pros and cons before he makes up his mind.
Winston Churchill, on the other hand, during World War II,
when Britain's survival was at stake, said "The power of the executive to cast a man into prison without formulating
any charge known to the law, and particularly to deny him judgment by his peers for an indefinite period, is in the highest
degree odious, and is the foundation of all totalitarian governments whether Nazi or Communist." salon.com article by Glenn Greenwald (4-1-07)
Manipulators Know How to Make People Feel Guilty (posted on
4-2-07) Manipulators know that many other people have different consciences than they do and they use
this knowledge to keep their victims feeling uncomfortable. They use techniques such as suggesting that their victims: --- are being selfish --- don't care enough ---
don't want it enough --- think they're too good --- aren't
being fair
These techniques are most effective for manipulators when victims don't
realize that their feelings are the result of techniques. Identifying them often dilutes their power. RickRoss.org
 |
 |
Techniques Manipulators Use
Bill O'Reilly Claims Poor Non-Whites Are Irresponsible and
Lazy (posted on 4-28-07) The Situation: Bill O'Reilly, host of the nationally
syndicated show, "The Radio Factor," stated the following: "Reagan
was not a confrontational guy, didn't like confrontation, much rather be your pal ... doesn't want to get involved
with the really nasty stuff, the tough stuff, and that's what racial politics is -- nasty and tough. ... It's hard
to do it because you gotta look people in the eye and tell 'em they're irresponsible and lazy. And who's gonna
wanna do that? Because that's what poverty is, ladies and gentlemen. In this country, you can succeed if you get educated
and work hard. Period. Period." The Manipulations: Here O'Reilly uses the "Big
Lie" and oversimplification techniques. In telling a Big Lie, he audaciously asserts that all it takes other
races to succeed is education and hard work. He completely ignores how much more difficult it is to grow up in a community
where one's parents are not well-educated, don't have much money--- even to cover the basics, and live in an environment
with many negative influences. Then he ignores the fact that even well-educated people are often not able to get good jobs
that help them earn a decent living. Many college graduates with good social contacts and learned cultural skills can't
get ahead, so what are the chances that a person who doesn't grow up in a good environment will be able to succeed? Whatever
the probability, it's not a sure thing like O'Reilly states. MediaMatters.org (4-16-04)

|
| Photo of Bill O'Reilly from cbsnews.com |
Limbaugh says Virginia Tech Killer "Had to Be a Liberal"
(posted on 4-22-07) The Situation: Radio commentator Rush Limbaugh, said:
"If this Virginia Tech shooter had an ideology, what do you think it was? This guy had to be a liberal.
You start railing against the rich and all this other--- this guy's a liberal. He was turned into a liberal somewhere
along the line. So it's a liberal that committed this act."
The Manipulation: Limbaugh starts
out with the word "if," and four sentences later, he concludes: "So it's a liberal that committed this
act." His evidence is that the shooter "railed against the rich."
The Conclusion:
Limbaugh appears to be trying to turn a tragedy into a political act, but the logic and evidence probably wouldn't
hold up in court! mediamatters.org (4-19-07)

|
| Photo of Rush Limbaugh from wikipedia.org |
White House Deputy Press Secretary Says Democrats' Iraq Funding Position
Is "So Unreasonable" (posted on 4-16-07) The Situation: At
her daily press briefing today, Dana Perino, temporarily replacing Tony Snow, who is recovering from a cancer operation, was
asked, "What is the outcome the president hopes to see at Wednesday's meeting (with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi
and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid) at the While House?" Here is the text of her answer: "The president hopes to find out if the Democrats are going to be able to come together and resolve their differences
and stop being so unreasonable1 and come to him at tell him how they're going to pass a clean bill2
that will get to his desk that will fund our troops. As you continue to hear from them, they are not consistent in their position3.
They refuse to take arbitrary timetables off the table4 and other restrictions against our generals; and the president
has said how he hopes they can come down here and get a clean bill to his desk. They've also said that they're not
going to let the troops go without funding5 and so there has to be a reasonable discussion on Wednesday and the
president hopes that that will be the beginning of that on Wednesday afternoon."
The Manipulations:
1. She is declaring that it's the Democrats that are being so unreasonable, not the president. 2. She isn't mentioning that the president didn't get clean bills for the previous six years. 3.
The House and the Senate bills are not consistent because the two houses of Congress passed two similar, but different
bills, and they haven't yet fully reconciled them yet. 4. The president has had four years to end
this war; now he needs to be held accountable. 5. Both houses have passed bills that fund the troops
in greater amounts than the president requested. It is his choice whether he wants to veto them. c-span.org White House Press Briefing (4-16-07)

|
| Photo of Dana Perino from chron.com |
Internet Marketer Claims That We Can Place Our Own Google Ads Free
(posted on 4-15-07) The Situation: An Internet entrepreneur is selling a product using a
system that he claims has gotten him $87 million in free Google pay-per-click ads. While this may or may not be the case,
one of the interesting techniques he uses to sell his "secret" is by answering frequently asked questions in his
online sales letter. Here is one of them: Q: Do I have to be some
kind of technical "wizard" to use and apply your system? A: Are you kidding? What would
be the point of trying to sell you something it took a Harvard PhD in order to use? The Manipulation:
His answer warns us that we are being ridiculous if we ask a question like that. This kind of technique is used
to prevent people from questioning his integrity, which is certainly open to question, given his claim. getgoogleadsfree.com
Orrin Hatch Attacks Critics Using the Wrong Facts
(posted on 4-6-07) The Situation:Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) appeared on "Meet the Press" this
past Sunday to defend Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who it appears fired up to eight US attorneys for political reasons. Senator Hatch said the following about Carol Lam, one of the fired prosecutors: "She
was a former law professor, no prosecutorial experience, and the former campaign manager in Southern California for Clinton." The Manipulation: The reality is that Carol Lam is not a former law professor; she has tremendous prosecutorial experience
(14 years as an Assistant US Attorney in San Diego), was appointed by President Bush, and could not have worked as a campaign
manager for President Clinton at the same time without violating the law, since she worked for the federal government as an
attorney. It would have been a potential violation of the Hatch Act to do both.
The Follow-up: Orrin Hatch gave out inaccurate information on national television. Then, yesterday, he wrote a letter
to Tim Russert, moderator of "Meet the Press," saying that he "accidentally used her name, instead of her predecessor."
This is a "non-apology" apology, because he was talking about Carol Lam on the program, not her predecessor.
Since his apology is purposely inaccurate, it's not difficult to conclude that his original statement was
purposely inaccurate.
The Conclusion: Orrin Hatch demonstrated another way to manipulate. . . to lie.
Then, when he was caught, he apologized. . . but his apology, which tried to cover up what he originally said, was another
lie. AirAmericaRadio.com (4-4-04) HuffingtonPost.com (4-5-07)

|
| Photo of Orrin Hatch from media.washingtonpost.com |
"Bush Logic" Says Funding Bills Don't Support
Troops (posted on 4-3-07) The Situation: Both houses of Congress have just passed
bills to provide more funding for the troops than the president requested. However, while the bills were being debated, the
president said he would veto them because he didn't want to comply with a timetable to withdraw the troops from Iraq as
the bills require. President Bush gave a speech today, stating the following:
"The
bottom line is this: Congress's failure to fund our troops on the front lines will mean that some of our military families
could wait longer for their loved ones to return from the front lines. And others could see their loved ones headed back
to the war earlier than they need to. That is unacceptable to me, and I believe it is unacceptable to the American people."
The Manipulation: Clearly, since both houses of Congress have just passed bills to provide more funding
for the troops than the president requested, if he chooses to veto legislation because he doesn't want to comply with
a timetable to withdraw them from Iraq, he is the one who is failing to support them. Giving his intelligence the benefit
of the doubt, he is purposely using convoluted logic for his own benefit. tpmcafe.com article by Greg Sargent (4-3-07)
Senior Counselor to President Evades Question on War With Iran
(posted on 4-3-07) The Situation: Moderator Bob Schieffer interviewed Dan Bartlett, senior counselor
to the president, on "Face the Nation" on Sunday after Iran boarded a British ship and took 15 sailors hostage. Here is
an excerpt from their conversation:
Bob Schieffer: The president came down very hard on Iran yesterday.
He said there's no excuse for them taking these prisoners. Are we about to get into a war with Iran here? Dan
Bartlett: That's not what he was suggesting at all. He is showing solidarity with the British government as
they pursue a diplomatic resolution to the problem.
The Manipulation: Dan Bartlett's main technique
here is answering a different question than what was asked. Mr. Schieffer asked, "Are we about to get into a war with
Iran?" Instead of answering "yes" or "no," Bartlett evaded the question by providing his interpretation
of what Mr. Bush was trying to communicate. Bartlett is giving the interpretation intended for the American people. The correct
interpretation of the same statement for President Ahmadinejad of Iraq is likely very different. "Face the Nation" transcript Page 9 (4-1-07)

|
| Photo of Dan Bartlett from msnbc.com |
Has Bush Taken Advantage of People Who Signed Up for the
National Guard? (posted 4-25-07) Is it fair for people who signed up for the National
Guard to be on call for disasters and emergencies to be sent to Iraq?
The American Flag is Flying Half-Mast in Afghanistan (posted
on 4-23-07) Why do you think that the American flag is flying at half-mast in Afghanistan in honor of
the 32 victims of the Virginia Tech killer but has not been flown at half-mast for the 315 Americans
who have been killed there since our invasion? canoe.ca (4-23-07)
Should Guns Be Allowed on College Campuses?
(posted on 4-18-07) In the aftermath of the Virginia Tech shootings, gun supporters are asserting that
less people would have died if the State of Virginia had allowed students and faculty members to carry guns on their campuses.
They think that someone in the classroom would have shot the attacker soon after he opened fire. While this is unlikely, there
is no mention of the culture of fear that would be created nor the increased likelihood that students would be killed in other
incidents. Do you think society would be safer if we went back to the days of the Wild West where people were allowed
to carry their own weapons?
Did You Know That Our Nation Has 30,000 Gun Deaths a Year? (posted
on 4-18-07) We changed our way of life when 3000 people were killed on 9/11/01. Why doesn't
30,000 gun death per year change anything? HuffingtonPost.com article by R.J. Eskow (4-18-07)
 |